Skip to main content

The US stock market and technology giants will tremble If this woman becomes the president of the United States

As the 2020 election year approaches, competition between US presidential candidates is becoming more intense.

Recently, US Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has become more and more supportive. On October 13, local time, according to the US Columbia TV news, Warren has recently extended the electoral advantage to 18 states, and 31% to 25% lead Biden, compared with 26% to 25% released in September, the gap Significantly expanded.

This trend has made Wall Street and the US technology giants a bit flustered. Wall Street believes that Warren's coming to power may pose a huge threat to the US stock market; the US technology giant even threatened to "do everything possible" to deal with her.

The least friendly to the market?

If Warren is in power, what will happen to the US stock market?

Hedge fund giant Leon Cooperman once said on CNBC's show:
"If Elisabeth Warren is the next president, the stock market will simply not have to open."

Leon Cooperman's remarks point to Wall Street's concerns about Warren. CNN even bluntly said that the better the data of the Warren poll, the higher the anxiety on Wall Street.

Lori Calvasina, head of US equity strategy at Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets, said in the report: "Investors clearly think Biden is better than Warren."

Calvasina pointed out that in fact, Warren was seen as the "most unfriendly to the market" candidates.

Why is Wall Street so afraid of Warren? Because Warren's campaign idea is to do more things to regulate the financial market after he takes office, especially in the technology, healthcare and energy industries.

Not only that, but she also proposed to impose a 2% wealth tax on households with net assets of more than $50 million per year, and a 3% wealth tax on households with net assets of more than $1 billion per year. The money bag of the rich Americans.

But Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets Inc. believes that Wall Street's fear of Warren seems to have gone too far, and said that if Warren was elected president of the United States, the stock market would not be too bad.

Calvasina said in the report, "When Warren is elected, the pain she brings is only temporary." She believes that the current risks of the US financial, energy, healthcare and industrial sectors are completely underestimated, so these industries It should be more regulated.

Calvasina also said that small-cap stocks may perform better than large-cap stocks because they have less direct risk from policy adjustments.

Matt Daley, managing director of the investment management company Conning and head of corporate credit research, believes that Warren's victory may drive some market and economic development. He pointed out that if Warren wins the White House competition, clean energy and infrastructure may benefit.

Not only that, but more people believe that Warren's policy agenda after he took office will definitely differ from her commitment during the campaign. Analysts at Moffett Nathanson, a technology, media and telecommunications research firm, said that "there is a difference between Warren's campaign speech and actual policy, and we are relatively optimistic."

Facebook is called
American technology companies are also wary of Warren, because Warren has threatened to split these tech giants if they come to power.

Last weekend, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of American social media giant Facebook, fought a war with Warren.

Zuckerberg said that if Warren is elected president, then Facebook will "do everything possible" to defeat Warren's split Facebook project.

Subsequently, Warren publicly accused Facebook of being a company that "lie to make money."

In order to prove Facebook's weakness in dealing with "false political advertisements", Warren released a message "Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook just supported Donald Trump's re-election", and Facebook did not do anything to this make up political advertisement. The message just sent out smoothly.

Warren said, "This is a website with more than 85% of social network traffic. It has too much power, but there is almost no competition or accountability. They use our private information to profit and undermine our democratic and competitive environment. "

However, other large technology companies are not as tough as Facebook, but rather to show good will to Warren in advance. According to statistics from the US website OpenSecrets.org, Google's parent companies Alphabet, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft's Staff Council (PAC) have become Warren's largest political donation donors. At the same time, American media CNA's AT&T, Disney and international business machine company IBM (IBM-US) are also the top 20 sponsors of Warren's campaign.

According to the US media VOX report, many American Technology industry even admire Warren very much, because her political views are the most practical and the most serious.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

span[class~="sr-only"]

  The  span[class~="sr-only"]  selector will select any  span  element whose  class   includes   sr-only . Create that selector, and give it a  border  property set to  0 . span [ class ~= "sr-only" ] {    border:   0 ; }

We may be able to produce plastic with carbon dioxide someday

Due to the overuse of humans, there are now about 8 billion tons of plastic waste piled up on the surface and in the ocean. It is no wonder that plastics have been in poor reputation in recent years. But the importance of plastic is also unquestionable. The invention of plastic revolutionized life in the 20th century. It is durable, versatile, and hygienic. Such materials are almost non-existent in nature. If there is no plastic, we will never create records, tapes, film, etc. Naturally, we will not be able to record music, film, or develop modern medicine. Auto parts, light aircraft materials, satellites and spacecraft also rely on plastics, and global travel and space exploration are possible, not to mention computers, mobile phones and a wide range of networking technologies. Look around, if there is no plastic, our life will be difficult. Despite the importance of plastics, the disposal of plastics has always been a tricky issue. Not only that, but the source of plastic is...

《菊与刀》――解读日本人

第一章 任务―研究日本 由在美国曾经全力以赴与之战斗的敌人中,日本人的脾气是最琢磨不透的。这个强大对手,其行动和思维习惯竞与我们如此迥然不同,以至我们必须认真加以对待,这种情况在其他战争中是没有的。我们正如前此1905年的沙俄一样,作战的对手是一个不属于西方文化传统、而又充分武装和经过训练的民族。西方国家所公认的那些基于人性的战争惯例,对日本人显然是不存在的。这就使得太平洋上的战争不仅是一系列岛屿登陆作战和困难卓绝的后勤工作问题,从而使了解"敌性"成为一个主要问题。为了与之对抗,我们就必须了解他们的行动。 困难是巨大的。自从日本锁国的大门被打开以来的七十五年间,对日本人的描述总是使用一系列令人极为迷惑的"但是,又……"之类的词句,远非对世界其他民族的描述可比。一个严肃的观察家在论及其他非日本民族时,是不大会既说他们彬彬有礼,又加上一句说:"但是,他们又很蛮横、倔傲。"他也不会既说该民族无比顽固,又说:"但是,他们又极易适应激烈的革新";也不会既说该民族性格温顺,又说他们不轻易服从上级的控制;也不会既说他们忠诚、宽厚,又宣称:"但是他们又心存叛逆,满腹怨恨";也不会既说他们勇敢成性,又描述他们如何怯懦;也不会既说他们的行动完全出自考虑别人的评价,即自己的面子,又说他们具有真诚的善良倾慕西方文化,又渲染他们顽固的保守主义。他不会既写一本书讲这个民族如何普遍爱美,如何对演员和艺术家给予崇高荣誉,如何醉心于菊花栽培,又另外写一本书来补充说,该民族崇尚刀剑和武土的无尚荣誉。 然而,所有上述这些矛盾却成为有关日本论著中纵横交织的经纬。而且,都是千真万确。刀与菊,两者都是一幅绘画的组成部分。日本人生性极其好斗而又非常温和;黩武而又爱美;倔傲自尊而又彬彬有礼;顽梗不化而又柔弱善变;驯服而又不愿受人摆布;忠贞而又易于叛变;勇敢而又懦怯;保守而又十分欢迎新的生活方式。他们十分介意别人对自己的行为的观感,但当别人对其劣迹毫无所知时,又会被罪恶所征服。他们的军队受到彻底的训练,却又具有反抗性。 了解日本既已成为美国的当务之急,我们就不能对这些矛盾以及其他许多同样令人烦躁的矛盾置之不理了。严重的事态接二连三地出现在我们面前。日本人下一步将采取什么行动?能否不进攻日本本土而获致投降?我们是否应该...