Skip to main content

What kind of president does the United States need now?


Imagine if the Soviet Union still exists and, like the Communist China, the Soviets firmly control the power. Like the present China, the ideology does not allow any democratic ideas to exist. It launches a large-scale spy war and steals advanced Western technology. ..., for the United States, it is definitely a disaster, and the United States is no longer the only superpower; the United States has to maintain a large-scale military presence in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and South America in response to the Soviet threat.


Fortunately, since President Ronald Reagan came to power, he has adopted a smart financial policy and cut off the financing channels of the Soviet Union. At the same time, he used oil weapons to form an alliance with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia increased oil production, causing oil prices to plummet from 35 US dollars per barrel. To the 12 dollars, the result is that the Soviet Union’s oil revenue has plummeted. Eventually, the Soviet economy was exhausted, a political crisis broke out, and eventually it disintegrated. The super powerful Soviet Union is no longer existed.

It is a pity that the president after Reagan no longer has a big pattern and strategic vision. Clinton, Obama, one is more stupid than a one, even helping China to rise. If China is a normal democracy, this rise is accompanied by the integration of Chinese values ​​into mainstream values, which is a good thing. However, the grim situation is that China's communist ideology and authoritarianism are exported to other countries with economic support.

The current president, Donald Trump, is short-sighted and has no big strategic vision. For short-term interests (elections), he bows to the Communist China from time to time, he says today there will be sanction or tariff but tomorrow he will be shaking hands with the counter part. He is a businessman who is too heavy on short-term interests to be as imaginative as President Reagan.

Imagine how faint the future of the United States would be if it was to be appeased by the Communist Party of China. Therefore, the United States urgently needs a president like Ronaldo Reagan!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Low risk, high reward: the asymmetric black swan trade

Cornwall Capital was founded in 2003 by two young people who were not in the mainstream - Charlie Ledley, and Gammy Mak. I say they were out of the mainstream because they were not financial professionals from a scientific background, but they were full of imagination, and a keen insight into the market. Their insight is evident in the transactions of First Capital Financial. Case Background Before betting that the subprime mortgage market would collapse, Cornwall Capital first noticed a credit card business company, First Capital Financial. Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, First Capital Financial claimed that it had better tools than other firms for analyzing the creditworthiness of subprime credit card users and pricing the risk of lending to them, and the market bought that claim. But in July 2002, First Capital Financial's stock fell 60% in two days after the company voluntarily disclosed a disagreement between them and two government regulators: How much capital did they ...

盘点类似河北的儿童杀人案,是如何判决的

clear元素清除浮动float

 clear元素用来清除左边或者右边或者两边的浮动元素(float) 比如: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8">  <title>菜鸟教程(runoob.com)</title>  <style> img { float:left; border:1px solid red; } p.clear { clear:both; } </style> </head> <body> <img src="logocss.gif" width="95" height="84" /> <p>This is some text. This is some text. This is some text. This is some text. This is some text. This is some text.</p> <p class="clear">This is also some text. This is also some text. This is also some text. This is also some text. This is also some text. This is also some text.</p> </body> </html> 第一段p没有指定clear,因此左边会有图片,而第二段class是clear,clear: both,清除了两边的浮动元素,左右都不会出现浮动元素,所以它自己占单独的行,不和其他浮动元素占一行。